Entry tags:
This is an ex-HTML
Okay, I think I'm going mad. I put the following into our CMS:
<ul>and it (silently, without any notification) 'corrected' it to the following:
<li> Item 1
<ul>
<li> SubItem 1</li>
<li> SubItem 2</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li> Item 2</li>
</ul>
<ul>I pointed this out to the people who are setting up the new site for us, and they raised it as a support call with the CMS people, and got the following response:
<li>Item 1
<ul></ul></li>
<li>SubItem 1</li>
<li>SubItem 2</li>
<li>Item 2</li></ul>
"Could you please use the following schema:If such syntax is formatted correctly, why doesn't it validate? I'm not even trying to be a validation Nazi about this (it's not as if anything that comes out of this CMS is ever going to validate anyway), it's more that I don't really want to have to 'correct' all our existing HTML to prevent it being 'corrected' by the CMS.
<ul>
<li>Item 1</li>
<ul>
<li>SubItem 1</li>
<li>SubItem 2</li>
</ul>
<li>Item 2</li>
</ul>
Such syntax is formatted correctly."
no subject
(I'm afraid all my politeness generators are out of whack at the moment, as a bug in the code means that they convert everything to "AGGGGHHHHHH! COCKING COCKMONSTERS!" - which is formatted correctly.)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
0xE2 B3
no subject
no subject
It's one step in undoing the damage caused by the Tower of Cockle.