Logic hates
Is there a name for the (il)logical pattern that goes something like:
I've been tagging it as "false consciousness" in my brain, but that's a bit of a misnomer.
"I believe/think/have experienced X. You believe/think/claim to have experienced not-X. Therefore you are deluding yourself"?
I've been tagging it as "false consciousness" in my brain, but that's a bit of a misnomer.
no subject
It's a perfectly valid view in more vigorous metaphysical structures, of course, and you find its equally blinkworthy converse in starey-eyed evangelical atheism. Well, I find I blink more often when people stare at me, at any rate.
no subject
Evangelicals of both stripes* do this, definitely. "You claim to have (never) experienced God, I have (never) done so, therefore you're deluded." Delete where applicable, PLEASE, DELETE DELETE DELETE.
* "badger evangelist"
no subject
You ask for a technical term. A's and B's point of difference is in their idols of the cave (idola specus); A's fallacious dismissal of B is an idol of the theatre, idola theatri.
no subject
I sincerely hope that I didn't tell you that you were deluded for not having experienced God; though if I did, well, I guess most people have to be 18 once in their lives, but hopefully can avoid remaining so for any longer than strictly necessary. :-}
I'm not sure what you mean about the "universally moralising God" of St Aldate's, though. But then I've blanked a lot of it from my mind.