I think you really need the insight and perspective that only the 31st comment saying the same thing can bring, so:
Civil weddings are the other way round from church weddings: the reception involves more people and is longer and more important than the ceremony. I also think that this is easy for most people to understand, and that most people wil grasp that being invited to your "wedding" may well be an invite to the reception only.
Where you might have trouble is with older people who are used to church weddings where the world and his wife turn up to the ceremony and it's the reception which is limited in numbers. (We had similar problems at our own wedding, where someone who wasn't even invited to any of it turned up unannounced and sat down in the room where the ceremony was taking place, because she's used to church weddings and she thought she could just slip in at the back like you would in a church.)
I have more advice about how to break it to these older people, but maybe I'll email you instead of making this comment even longer.
no subject
Civil weddings are the other way round from church weddings: the reception involves more people and is longer and more important than the ceremony. I also think that this is easy for most people to understand, and that most people wil grasp that being invited to your "wedding" may well be an invite to the reception only.
Where you might have trouble is with older people who are used to church weddings where the world and his wife turn up to the ceremony and it's the reception which is limited in numbers. (We had similar problems at our own wedding, where someone who wasn't even invited to any of it turned up unannounced and sat down in the room where the ceremony was taking place, because she's used to church weddings and she thought she could just slip in at the back like you would in a church.)
I have more advice about how to break it to these older people, but maybe I'll email you instead of making this comment even longer.