Date: 2003-09-27 01:23 pm (UTC)
*nods*

I do see what you mean, but I was sort of reading it for different things. I didn't really want to say "I found this interesting because [stuff]" when I posted it because I wanted to see what other people's reactions were, but maybe I should have done -- it was only one angle of it that I was really interested in.

I think I failed to object to "neurotic" and "distressed" because to me they seem like very accurate descriptions of the way I feel in that context. :-/ Maybe I was overpersonalising the whole thing ... probably because I'm neurotic, weak and not clever enough to really understand the article at all except where I can say "Ooooh, that sounds like me! It's about me!"

articles ... about quantum mechanics and the development of greek drama

I probably thought they were terribly clever and original and interdisciplinary, because I'm too stupid to know any better. :-(
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15 161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 13th, 2025 09:39 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios