Inventory: several tins of luncheon meat
May. 13th, 2004 02:24 pmTwo adjacent subject lines in my inbox today were "invite beret" and "incant yalta". Should I be worried that my immediate reaction to those was along the lines of "YOU CAN'T DO THAT HERE"?
no subject
Date: 2004-05-14 01:34 am (UTC)I've just had one from Elba Barajas with the subject "koran". It came through the leaky spam filter, so on the offchance that it was from one of the overseas students whose name I didn't recognise, I opened it.
_____ ( _`\ (_ _) | (_(_)_ __ __ __ | | __ __ ___ ___ | _) ( '__)/'__`\ /'__`\ | | /'__`\ /'__`\/' _ `\/',__) | | | | ( ___/( ___/ | |( ___/( ___/| ( ) |\__, \ (_) (_) `\____)`\____) (_)`\____)`\____)(_) (_)(____/(etc...)
no subject
Date: 2004-05-14 04:14 am (UTC)Anyway, the four messages claimed to come from:
Minnie Ramirez (Subject: perceive)
Rosalind Gutierrez (Subject: food)
Bonnie Bland (Subject: Hot Freee Teen Fu|< Videos discriminant)
Priscilla Hearn (Subject: harrow buenos).
Invented names seem to be the in thing at the moment. Yesterday I had a spam that was addressed to "randal hooten", CC: "hayden osawa", "shannon mccants", "elroy dickhaut", "dennis lima", "berry danesh", "evan schrott", "lazaro bula", "jasper raymond" - all with different email addresses on our ECS system (most of which used to be valid but haven't existed for years). And "evan schrott" was me.
no subject
Date: 2004-05-14 05:21 am (UTC)I've had a lot of the graphical writing stuff slipping through, too, but then I have to set the filter at a pretty low level, otherwise the Head of Department and his secretary get caught (lots of Word documents forwarded without comment, messages that consist only of comments from a previous message, etc).