Oh, and...
May. 19th, 2004 01:09 pmI selected a bunch of words at random and made them go pretty colours!
toaster
ophthalmic
knob
curious
sigma
fnord
W00+! p|-|34r /\/\y I_33+ |-|+/\/\I_ 5|
toaster
ophthalmic
knob
curious
sigma
fnord
W00+! p|-|34r /\/\y I_33+ |-|+/\/\I_ 5|
no subject
Date: 2004-05-19 05:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-19 05:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-19 06:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-19 06:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-19 06:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-19 07:18 am (UTC)We've done this…
If you are a Mozilla and Xcolibur user then no, they won't. The entry view in Xcolibur contains a DOCTYPE which switches Mozilla into strict mode, which means you have to use either one of the 16 defined colour names or a hex triplet.
No, we haven't
Date: 2004-05-19 07:23 am (UTC)Re: No, we haven't
Date: 2004-05-19 07:28 am (UTC)It wasn't a meme at all! It was a piss-take of the current craze for "I put all the names of my friends in funny colours"! And boy, did it backfire. :-}
no subject
Date: 2004-05-19 07:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-19 07:30 am (UTC)I think my joke misfired. :-/
Re: No, we haven't
Date: 2004-05-19 07:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-19 07:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-19 07:37 am (UTC)Netscape == Mozilla
All I meant was that I had no idea if those words would result in anything if I put them into my LJ as an entry
Sorry, brain the wrong way round. What I meant to say was `We've done this. Yes they will, because LJ's recent-entries view does not contain a DOCTYPE which switches Mozilla into strict mode.'
no subject
Date: 2004-05-19 07:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-19 09:17 am (UTC)*runs off to test this out*
Damn it, now there're crumbs in my keyboard. And it didn't work.
no subject
Date: 2004-05-19 09:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-19 09:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-19 09:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-19 11:37 am (UTC)I hope the trustees of the estate of T S Eliot are not reading this.
no subject
Date: 2004-05-19 11:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-19 01:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-19 01:32 pm (UTC)*p|-|34r5*
no subject
Date: 2004-05-20 01:08 am (UTC)Now I'm not sure if I can't or you can't.
no subject
Date: 2004-05-20 01:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-20 05:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-20 06:02 am (UTC)We have a selection at home, including one that's too heavy to life even split into two volumes.
Last thing we checked was 'farrow' to see if it derives from some old word for ickle babby piglit (it does).