Oh, and...

May. 19th, 2004 01:09 pm
j4: (southpark)
[personal profile] j4
I selected a bunch of words at random and made them go pretty colours!

toaster
ophthalmic
knob
curious
sigma
fnord

W00+! p|-|34r /\/\y I_33+ |-|+/\/\I_ 5|

Date: 2004-05-19 05:55 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] j4.livejournal.com
They've all come out in black here... I think you may have outdone me in the irony stakes.

Date: 2004-05-19 06:01 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bopeepsheep.livejournal.com
I have no idea if they would work in an actual entry, I just picked the first words to come to mind. :-)

Date: 2004-05-19 07:18 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imc.livejournal.com
I have no idea if they would work in an actual entry

We've done this…

If you are a Mozilla and Xcolibur user then no, they won't. The entry view in Xcolibur contains a DOCTYPE which switches Mozilla into strict mode, which means you have to use either one of the 16 defined colour names or a hex triplet.

No, we haven't

Date: 2004-05-19 07:23 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bopeepsheep.livejournal.com
I'm not one of them there Mozilla users and you're answering a question that was never asked (or something). All I meant was that I had no idea if those words would result in anything if I put them into my LJ as an entry as the sort-of-meme demanded. Since yesterday's experiment seems to prove that a lot of words do come out coloured in my particular setup, I will just have to try it and see, won't I?

Re: No, we haven't

Date: 2004-05-19 07:28 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] j4.livejournal.com
as the sort-of-meme demanded

It wasn't a meme at all! It was a piss-take of the current craze for "I put all the names of my friends in funny colours"! And boy, did it backfire. :-}

Re: No, we haven't

Date: 2004-05-19 07:32 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bopeepsheep.livejournal.com
Oh, no, I knew it wasn't a real one. Your leet skills bit gave that away. That's why I put sort-of and why I didn't actually obey it. (And why my words aren't exactly meaningful or sensible either.) I apologise for my husband's turning this into a browser rant. :-)

Date: 2004-05-19 07:37 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imc.livejournal.com
I'm not one of them there Mozilla users

Netscape == Mozilla

All I meant was that I had no idea if those words would result in anything if I put them into my LJ as an entry

Sorry, brain the wrong way round. What I meant to say was `We've done this. Yes they will, because LJ's recent-entries view does not contain a DOCTYPE which switches Mozilla into strict mode.'

Date: 2004-05-19 07:53 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bopeepsheep.livejournal.com
I have IE on this machine too, you know (spit). And for these coloured entries have been using it on and off to see if it makes a difference. Anyway, you're dissecting a joke too much. Stop it.

Date: 2004-05-19 11:55 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] k425.livejournal.com
They were coloured here.

Date: 2004-05-19 06:16 am (UTC)

Date: 2004-05-19 09:25 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] juggzy.livejournal.com
OK. That actually works, as a piece of evocation, rather than being a bunch of pretty colours. You get a prize, you soppy, poetic, beardy.

Date: 2004-05-19 11:37 am (UTC)
ext_22879: (Default)
From: [identity profile] nja.livejournal.com
I wrote it myself, too!

I hope the trustees of the estate of T S Eliot are not reading this.

Date: 2004-05-19 07:28 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rysmiel.livejournal.com
This is the first of many people on my friends list doing this that's actually shown up right in Konqueror. What are you doing differently ?

Date: 2004-05-19 07:30 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] j4.livejournal.com
Er, I'm explicitly specifying web-safe colo(u)rs in valid HTML. Not just putting random words, people's names, slices of toast etc. in the color= attribute.

I think my joke misfired. :-/

Date: 2004-05-19 09:17 am (UTC)
darcydodo: (dodo)
From: [personal profile] darcydodo
Ooh, I didn't try putting a slice of toast in!

*runs off to test this out*

Damn it, now there're crumbs in my keyboard. And it didn't work.

Date: 2004-05-19 09:32 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] j4.livejournal.com
Try putting birds in your keyboard, to eat the crumbs?

Date: 2004-05-19 09:34 am (UTC)
darcydodo: (bird)
From: [personal profile] darcydodo
Ooh, ooh, good plan.

Date: 2004-05-19 07:33 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imc.livejournal.com
Not many people can spell .

Date: 2004-05-20 01:08 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] oldbloke.livejournal.com
Damn.
Now I'm not sure if I can't or you can't.

Date: 2004-05-20 05:24 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imc.livejournal.com
You could always try a dictionary (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=ophthalmic)…

Date: 2004-05-20 06:02 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] oldbloke.livejournal.com
Too easy!
We have a selection at home, including one that's too heavy to life even split into two volumes.
Last thing we checked was 'farrow' to see if it derives from some old word for ickle babby piglit (it does).

Date: 2004-05-19 01:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] burkesworks.livejournal.com
Well, let's try it with this famous quote from Chomsky;





Date: 2004-05-19 01:32 pm (UTC)
ext_44: (pattern)
From: [identity profile] jiggery-pokery.livejournal.com
*giggles*

*p|-|34r5*

Date: 2004-05-20 01:12 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] oldbloke.livejournal.com
The newsletter from the Association of Teachers of Mathematics is delivered in html and text. Some people complained about not being able to read the colours in the html version of the last one. Partly a Microsoft thing, I think, and maybe partly a how-many-colours-does-your-screen-have thing - he had shades of blue for both fore and back. Looked nice on my screen, probably awful on bog-standard VGA.

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15 161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 28th, 2026 09:10 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios