Catch22

May. 24th, 2004 03:52 pm
j4: (hair)
[personal profile] j4
I have received an email to which I cannot reply without risking offending, and to which I cannot refrain from replying without risking offending.

I would like the internet to be accidentally unplugged by the cleaner, please, so that I don't have to make a decision.

Date: 2004-05-24 08:01 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bibliogirl.livejournal.com
Send a blank reply? (The closest the Internet has to 'mu'?)

Date: 2004-05-24 08:11 am (UTC)
karen2205: Me with proper sized mug of coffee (Default)
From: [personal profile] karen2205
Wait 24 hours. Write a reply. Wait another 24 hours and amend it as necessary and then send it anyway.

48 hours ish is a perfectly reasonable length of time to wait for a reply.

In any case being afraid of offending someone is generally not a good reason for not doing something - go ahead and say what needs to be said gently and see what happens.

Date: 2004-05-24 08:22 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kaet.livejournal.com
Do you think the person who sent the email would know that would be the case?

Date: 2004-05-24 08:28 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] j4.livejournal.com
If I knew what the person who sent the email thought, I wouldn't be in this situation. :-(

Date: 2004-05-24 08:48 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kaet.livejournal.com
I guess that there's the risk of offense if you ask, too?

I think when things get so complicated and tied up in knots, that I tend just to say it anyway. People can expect you to make reasonable moves to avoid offence, but relationships aren't supposed to be logic puzzles, and people aren't perfact, and communication faulty, and if they have trouble understanding those things, then that's not really your problem. If I say that the reason for a mail wasn't to cause offence, though I acknowledge that it might do so, but that other options were bigger dangers or wouldn't have reduced offence, then there's not much else you can do. Sometimes things will cause offence, I think. I'm not easily offended myself, but everyone has their own ways of dealing with things. Of course, if you're a necessary part of that person's way of dealing with offence, then it all becomes knotty again. Though I think it's easy to believe oneself necessary to the process by a kind of mistransferance from observing that you are sufficient for it.

Date: 2004-05-24 09:07 am (UTC)
juliet: (Default)
From: [personal profile] juliet
In that sort of situation I think in general I'd be inclined to reply, as gently as possible, and possibly even saying 'I hope you're not offended, but I thought I'd rather reply than not'.

Sometimes folk are less easily offended than one thinks they might be; sometimes it's just not possible to avoid offence, which doesn't mean it's your fault. Sometimes things need to be said even with the risk of offence.

Plus, if you *don't* reply, it's possible that they may email you again in a couple of days asking whether you got their message, or whatever. Which is probably worse.

Date: 2004-05-24 01:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] oldbloke.livejournal.com
Can you convincingly fake a bounce?
Maybe down the server and get the mail resubmitted while it isn't there, somehow...

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15 161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 8th, 2026 04:16 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios