The wrong trousers
Oct. 12th, 2004 12:33 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Holy crap. From ucam.adverts.forsale:
Now, okay, I own far too many clothes and spend more money than I should on them, but I simply can't imagine having the kind of lifestyle where I could cheerfully spend a hundred and eighty pounds on something -- anything, let alone a pair of jeans -- and then be happy to sell it at a loss after an hour. I also can't imagine not realising that I already own enough pairs of Armani jeans, but that's another matter; for me the zero pairs I already own are quite enough.
Am I being naïve to believe this chap's story? I mean, is this actually just a complicated way of reselling off-the-back-of-a-lorry merchandise at a profit, like the way some folk on u.a.fs routinely sell duty-free cigarettes on behalf of spurious friends who only realised after buying a gazillion Gauloises that they wanted to give up?
Pair of beautiful Armani Jeans, bought in Canada 2 weeks ago for $400
(approx £180). Dark, almost shiny blue denim, with true hemp lining. Low
rise, with lowish crotch. Price in Uk about £225.
The story is that I bought them while on a random shopping trip, then got
home and realised I have too many jeans as it is... so I probably wont be
wearing them. Its a pity to see such great jeans sit the season out in my
closet, so I'll consider any offer!
Size 34 waist although I am a 32.. Basically if you are interested and you
are anywhere between 32-34, give them a try. Have actually only been worn
once... for about an hour. You are welcome to try them on if you are
interested.
Now, okay, I own far too many clothes and spend more money than I should on them, but I simply can't imagine having the kind of lifestyle where I could cheerfully spend a hundred and eighty pounds on something -- anything, let alone a pair of jeans -- and then be happy to sell it at a loss after an hour. I also can't imagine not realising that I already own enough pairs of Armani jeans, but that's another matter; for me the zero pairs I already own are quite enough.
Am I being naïve to believe this chap's story? I mean, is this actually just a complicated way of reselling off-the-back-of-a-lorry merchandise at a profit, like the way some folk on u.a.fs routinely sell duty-free cigarettes on behalf of spurious friends who only realised after buying a gazillion Gauloises that they wanted to give up?
no subject
Date: 2004-10-12 05:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-12 05:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-12 05:18 am (UTC)Jeez. A pair of jeans should cost less that £30.
And not be shiny.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-12 05:33 am (UTC)That said, for £180 I'd want them to be bulletproof, self-cleaning and have built-in levitators...
no subject
Date: 2004-10-12 06:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-12 07:47 am (UTC)I think I'm turning into my father.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-12 08:06 am (UTC)In fact, I believe some of the items I am currently wearing come from there.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-13 03:11 am (UTC)Yes, but they are still a Scottish company, based in Paisley. And I know that
no subject
Date: 2004-10-13 03:13 am (UTC)Er, whatever.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-13 03:24 am (UTC)Well, at the very least, they clearly have excellent taste.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-13 03:48 am (UTC)Never having tasted most of them, I'll have to take your word for that... ;F
no subject
Date: 2004-10-13 03:56 am (UTC)But I think it's a well-kept secret that they exist outside Scotland, you know.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-12 08:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-12 11:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-12 07:49 am (UTC)Less than £10, more like! But then I wouldn't bother buying jeans new. Actually, I probably wouldn't bother buying jeans at all.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-12 07:50 am (UTC)Where? Where?
no subject
Date: 2004-10-12 07:56 am (UTC)For you, the best bet is probably the main street in Headington; at least, there used to be lots of charity shops there. Mind you it's 5 years or so since I was there.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-12 08:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-14 03:23 am (UTC)