Here we go again
Nov. 17th, 2004 05:27 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
j4Yes, it's another questions thingy, because I'm bored (and quite probably boring). Stolen from ![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
kennedybak this time.
[A] First, recommend to me:
1. a movie:
2. a book:
3. a musical artist, song, or album:
[B] I want everyone who reads this to ask me three questions, no more, no less. Ask me anything you want.
1.
2.
3.
[C] Then I want you to go to your journal, copy and paste this allowing your friends to ask you anything & say that you stole it from me.
kennedybak this time.[A] First, recommend to me:
1. a movie:
2. a book:
3. a musical artist, song, or album:
[B] I want everyone who reads this to ask me three questions, no more, no less. Ask me anything you want.
1.
2.
3.
[C] Then I want you to go to your journal, copy and paste this allowing your friends to ask you anything & say that you stole it from me.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2004-11-17 11:41 pm (UTC)A2: Theodore Roethke's collected poems.
A3: Mekons, Rock 'n' Roll.
B1: Is an indistinct photograph a picture of a person at all?
B2: Is it even always an advantage to replace an indistinct picture by a sharp one?
B3: Isn't the indistinct one often exactly what we need?
C: Perhaps.