j4: (southpark)
[personal profile] j4
I have this theory that some of the documents we're sent for publication on the web are actually intended to contain information.

Date: 2005-09-09 02:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fluffymormegil.livejournal.com
Inconceivable!

Date: 2005-09-09 02:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] j4.livejournal.com
It certainly looks like a controversial theory, based on the evidence.

Date: 2005-09-09 02:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hoiho.livejournal.com
It's all in a s00per seekrit code to communicate with the Lizard Overlords! And you don't have the decoder ring.

Date: 2005-09-09 02:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rgl.livejournal.com
Maybe, in a desire to maximize information, each of these publications is a sample of random noise?

Date: 2005-09-09 02:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] j4.livejournal.com
Half of this hypothesis is almost certainly true, though to be fair I haven't analysed it to see if it's genuinely random.

The other half suggests that there's some kind of deliberate will being exercised rather than just general flailing about.

Date: 2005-09-09 02:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fluffymormegil.livejournal.com
You are excluding the possibility that the experimenter is external to the department, and is directing the flailing according to her whimsy.

The Mousetrix

Date: 2005-09-09 02:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] j4.livejournal.com
Hell, I'm still hanging on to the hope that the whole thing is just a big simulation being run by two white mice. Now, who moved my cheese?

Re: The Mousetrix

Date: 2005-09-09 02:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lusercop.livejournal.com
You mean those things that we do experiments on? It must be Friday, I never could get the hang of Fridays...

Date: 2005-09-09 02:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] d-floorlandmine.livejournal.com
Nope, that's an outdated hypothesis. It's been disproved many times.

Date: 2005-09-09 02:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rysmiel.livejournal.com
The words "dust hypothesis" spring uneasily to mind.

Date: 2005-09-09 02:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] j4.livejournal.com
Is this a Philip Pullman reference? The people I work with don't have souls or anything, you know.

Date: 2005-09-09 03:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rysmiel.livejournal.com
No, it was Permutation City; the idea that any information you like, up to and including the entire universe, is implicitly present in the same amount of randomly scrambled, or otherwise organised, bits of information.

Date: 2005-09-09 03:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fluffymormegil.livejournal.com
Given that any set of information requires meta-information in order for it to be intelligible, this is trivially true. All you have to do is use a different decoding algorithm.

Date: 2005-09-09 03:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] k425.livejournal.com
You're working at the university? If yes, then no.

If no, then, well, who knows.

Date: 2005-09-09 03:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] arnhem.livejournal.com
If yes, then no

I think that just about sums it up, yes. Or no.

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15 161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 7th, 2026 10:45 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios