The why to your heart
Apr. 10th, 2007 12:49 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
A one-question poll to start the week. No quibbling: how you interpret the question is part of the point. It's just something I've been thinking about, & I'm interested to see what the wisdom (or otherwise) of LiveJournal has to say.
[Poll #963593]
Edited to add: I was trying not to influence the answers by over-explaining the question, but perhaps I went too far in the opposite direction: so, just to clarify, I'm talking about interpersonal relationships rather than the abstract concept of the-state-of-relatedness-or-otherwise-of-things-to-other-things.
[Poll #963593]
Edited to add: I was trying not to influence the answers by over-explaining the question, but perhaps I went too far in the opposite direction: so, just to clarify, I'm talking about interpersonal relationships rather than the abstract concept of the-state-of-relatedness-or-otherwise-of-things-to-other-things.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-10 02:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-10 02:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-10 02:41 pm (UTC)to avoid irritating you?
To be honest, the-abstract-concept-of-relationships-between-things is not something I'm likely to find myself talking about very often, and I suspect I'm not alone in that bias. I also suspect that trying to persuade people to use longer disambiguating terms for the things that they talk about all the time, and reserve the shorter words/phrases for things they never talk about, is a bit of a lost cause.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-10 02:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-10 02:59 pm (UTC)And... if it's not a rude question... do you find that you're less irritated by the use of "relationship" to mean "romantic relationship" when you're in a "romantic relationship" yourself?
no subject
Date: 2007-04-10 03:08 pm (UTC)The latter question - I don't know. I think possibly less irritated but still not happy about it.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-10 03:26 pm (UTC)But it's apples and oranges, innit. Are apples inferior/superior to oranges? I'd venture to suggest that mouldy apples are inferior to non-mouldy oranges, but that may not apply if you really don't like oranges, though in that case the question's probably a bit pointless.
My original question was intended to be open-ended: there wasn't a "right" answer.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-11 07:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-11 08:28 am (UTC)Also, whoever heard of duck à la pomme? That'd clearly be rubbish.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-12 09:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-12 05:43 pm (UTC)Then again, I don't like oranges much.