ringtime for j4
Oct. 18th, 2007 08:56 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I has a ring! Got home from Oxfam to find that Owen had got the smaller-sized version back from the ring-people. He even went down on one knee again, until I told him to stop being daft. :-)
Photography-type-people, how would you go about taking a good photo of a ring on someone's finger? Bear in mind that I don't have the glassware to do seriously-close-up stuff... Also our house has very dim lighting, hence the orangey effect (I think I will have to try again in daylight).
Photography-type-people, how would you go about taking a good photo of a ring on someone's finger? Bear in mind that I don't have the glassware to do seriously-close-up stuff... Also our house has very dim lighting, hence the orangey effect (I think I will have to try again in daylight).
no subject
Date: 2007-10-18 08:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-18 08:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-18 08:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-18 08:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-18 08:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-18 08:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-18 08:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-18 09:49 pm (UTC)I do have macro mode & was using it but it's not very macro.
Volunteers -- nah, I was more interested in "trying to learn to take this sort of photo" than "trying to get a good photo of the ring for posterity". I mean, I'm hoping to still have a) the ring and b) my hand, for a good long while yet. :-)
no subject
Date: 2007-10-18 10:47 pm (UTC)This doesn't work perfectly if your light is so dimly orange that there's no blue recorded at all, but it generally works quite well for me.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-18 11:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-18 09:12 pm (UTC)Really, you just get as close as you can focus, in good light for depth of field, natural light for colour balance, and crop it and blow it up somehow later. Getting the way the hand lies to look right, if much of it is shown, will be the tough part.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-18 09:46 pm (UTC)Yeah, getting my hand to look not-actually-deformed was a PITA. I settled for one where my fingers looked broken and one where they looked amputated. :-}
no subject
Date: 2007-10-19 08:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-19 12:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-19 09:11 am (UTC)Anyway, congratwelluations on getting a ring that fits. I found that it took four goes in my case!
no subject
Date: 2007-10-19 09:37 am (UTC)I should have done a close up photo of the rings as the wedding I was doing the pictures for. I didn't occur to me. Damn.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-19 10:22 am (UTC)b) the narky thing about photographing your ring - to my eyes - is the reflection factor. Your ring has enough planarity to reflect almost-distinct background forms and lighting, and those reflections offset and almost overbalance the ring-on-finger image, as well as the embrace of the diamond by the arms of gold (? platinum?).
I would (she said, trying it out) hold up your hand, palm outwards, and slightly above your own eyeline, with your back towards a north-facing window in daylight (the ones in your flat overlooking the road would do nicely, I imagine). Tilt your hand until the light picks up the depth of the diamond, and take your picture from that angle.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-19 11:15 am (UTC)And you have just given me an Idea, actually. (Will post the photos if it works.) And reminded me of another Idea I had the other day! (Ditto re photos.) Maybe this day won't turn out to be a why-did-I-get-out-of-bed day after all. :-}
gold (? platinum ?)
9ct white gold. And finest cubic zirconia. :-) I think it's an absolutely lovely ring. & Owen chose it all by himself!