Vicious cycle
Oct. 26th, 2007 01:43 pmDear cyclists,
Cycling on the pavement is illegal. The reason it's illegal is that it is ANTISOCIAL, STUPID, and potentially DANGEROUS.
Cycling on a crowded pavement, even if it wasn't illegal, would still be ANTISOCIAL, STUPID and potentially DANGEROUS.
When you are told "stop cycling on the pavement" by somebody you have just nearly run over by trying to cycle off a busy pedestrian crossing onto a very narrow pavement, the correct answer is not to point at a nearby toddler on a plastic trike (on the pavement) and say "He's cycling on the pavement." Nor is it to yell "FUCK OFF".
Toddlers are allowed to cycle on the pavement, even though it's still fucking irritating and still fucking painful when they run over your heels/toes. However toddlers have an excuse for being as annoying and stupid as 2-year-olds, namely they're, like, actually two years old, and are still in training for being useful and non-irritating members of the human race. If you are riding a bike that's nearly as tall as me and you're old enough to have a stupid haircut, a tweed jacket and a cocking iPod -- and to shout FUCK OFF at strangers -- then I'm guessing you're actually old enough to learn to cycle on the road.
Furthermore, even if some OTHER CRETINS have parked their white vans and their sodding vanity-numberplated SUVs in the cycle lane and the zigzags so they can sit and read the paper while their morbidly obese other half waddles the 1.5 metres to the shop to buy fags and cake, that STILL doesn't make you NOT a cretin for cycling on the pavement.
Oh, and while we're here:
Cycling while smoking or using a mobile phone is probably not, in itself, illegal. It is, however, STUPID and potentially DANGEROUS. Yes, I know, you have superhuman balance and control and psychic powers which prevent other people doing anything unpredictable within a 5-metre radius of you; you are therefore quite capable of cycling while smoking, texting and juggling chainsaws, WHILE BLINDFOLDED. So get a fucking unicycle and join the circus. Oh, by the way, unicycling on the pavement? ALSO ILLEGAL.
No love,
me.
P.S. AND NINTHLY I don't want to know how ACTUALLY you ALWAYS cycle on the 40-foot-wide well-lit pavement outside your HOUSE and it's just the fascism of the nanny state and health-and-safety-gone-mad that says that's illegal and besides bikes have a decree from THE QUEEN that says they're allowed to run you over if they want to whereas cars are evil and are technically disallowed by the second law of thermodynamics. I also don't give a fuck how you cycled on a pavement when nobody was there to see and therefore it can't have really been illegal, unless you also prove at the same time that you can SHUT THE FUCK UP in the woods when there's nobody there to listen to you.
Cycling on the pavement is illegal. The reason it's illegal is that it is ANTISOCIAL, STUPID, and potentially DANGEROUS.
Cycling on a crowded pavement, even if it wasn't illegal, would still be ANTISOCIAL, STUPID and potentially DANGEROUS.
When you are told "stop cycling on the pavement" by somebody you have just nearly run over by trying to cycle off a busy pedestrian crossing onto a very narrow pavement, the correct answer is not to point at a nearby toddler on a plastic trike (on the pavement) and say "He's cycling on the pavement." Nor is it to yell "FUCK OFF".
Toddlers are allowed to cycle on the pavement, even though it's still fucking irritating and still fucking painful when they run over your heels/toes. However toddlers have an excuse for being as annoying and stupid as 2-year-olds, namely they're, like, actually two years old, and are still in training for being useful and non-irritating members of the human race. If you are riding a bike that's nearly as tall as me and you're old enough to have a stupid haircut, a tweed jacket and a cocking iPod -- and to shout FUCK OFF at strangers -- then I'm guessing you're actually old enough to learn to cycle on the road.
Furthermore, even if some OTHER CRETINS have parked their white vans and their sodding vanity-numberplated SUVs in the cycle lane and the zigzags so they can sit and read the paper while their morbidly obese other half waddles the 1.5 metres to the shop to buy fags and cake, that STILL doesn't make you NOT a cretin for cycling on the pavement.
Oh, and while we're here:
Cycling while smoking or using a mobile phone is probably not, in itself, illegal. It is, however, STUPID and potentially DANGEROUS. Yes, I know, you have superhuman balance and control and psychic powers which prevent other people doing anything unpredictable within a 5-metre radius of you; you are therefore quite capable of cycling while smoking, texting and juggling chainsaws, WHILE BLINDFOLDED. So get a fucking unicycle and join the circus. Oh, by the way, unicycling on the pavement? ALSO ILLEGAL.
No love,
me.
P.S. AND NINTHLY I don't want to know how ACTUALLY you ALWAYS cycle on the 40-foot-wide well-lit pavement outside your HOUSE and it's just the fascism of the nanny state and health-and-safety-gone-mad that says that's illegal and besides bikes have a decree from THE QUEEN that says they're allowed to run you over if they want to whereas cars are evil and are technically disallowed by the second law of thermodynamics. I also don't give a fuck how you cycled on a pavement when nobody was there to see and therefore it can't have really been illegal, unless you also prove at the same time that you can SHUT THE FUCK UP in the woods when there's nobody there to listen to you.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-26 01:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-26 01:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-26 01:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-26 01:35 pm (UTC)Cycling while smoking or using a mobile phone
Date: 2007-10-26 01:40 pm (UTC)James
no subject
Date: 2007-10-26 01:44 pm (UTC)Re: Cycling while smoking or using a mobile phone
Date: 2007-10-26 01:48 pm (UTC)I've only ever once seen someone get stopped for cycling on the pavement, and that was when he overtook a police car by mounting the pavement to the left of it, which is really just taking the piss.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-26 01:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-26 01:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-26 01:57 pm (UTC)I forgot about pedestrians in the cycle lane though. Usually IME it's two or three girls aged somewhere between 9 and 18 (who can tell?), wearing every single item of clothing from the dressing-up-box plus some ballet slippers made out of gold paper, all with at least one iPod and talking on at least one phone, who when you ring the bell or shout "get out of the road!" collapse into a) the road and b) a fit of hysterical, screaming giggles.
Or people walking BACKWARDS along the road talking to their mates.
Or cycling along the pavement so they can go at the same speed as their mates who are walking in the cycle lane ARGH DIE DIE DIE.
Re: Cycling while smoking or using a mobile phone
Date: 2007-10-26 02:02 pm (UTC)(friend of mine (on bike, on the road) was rear-ended yesterday by a taxi, who didn't stop; when she caught him up & went to remonstrate with him, there were a couple of bike cops nearby so she called them over. He zoomed off, turning right on a no-right-hand turn; which she called to their attention as well as explaining that he'd rear-ended her. They gave her a bollocking for stopping to remonstrate with the taxi near a pedestrian crossing, & did FA about the taxi.)
But agreed that, as you say, a significant proportion of people in/on whatever form of transport are just *crap*. Don't think I'd go so far as 90%, but then I am an optimist :-)
no subject
Date: 2007-10-26 02:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-26 02:03 pm (UTC)I think legally those ten years old and under are allowed to cycle on the pavement. But I see obviously middle-aged idiots doing it all the flipping time.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-26 02:12 pm (UTC)Mostly I think people just don't think about the needs of others.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-26 02:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-26 02:17 pm (UTC)On the other hand, you're driving an SUV and crash into a cyclist from behind, claiming `your brakes don't work' is unlikely to be relevant.
Still, I have an entirely off-road commute to work (until it floods) so I get to avoid all other road-users for now.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-26 02:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-26 02:22 pm (UTC)No, they're not. The Police choose not to act against children playing in front of their own house, on their own street, on their scooters and skateboards and bicycles.
That's all. I think there's something in the law that allows toddlers to trundle along on a tricycle, supervised by (or even tethered to) an adult but I wouldn't bet on it - it's about the Police and the CSO's showing discretion and choosing when to act on obvious hazards and irresponsible behaviour: they would definitely ask the parents to carry the trike and walk (or carry) the toddler in the crowds on Oxford Street on a Saturday.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-26 02:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-26 02:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-26 02:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-26 02:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-26 02:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-26 02:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-26 02:31 pm (UTC)