j4: (badgers)
[personal profile] j4
Today my mum took me and [livejournal.com profile] addedentry to a garden centre and bought us an apple tree (a Worcester Pearmain), as well as some other smaller tasty plants (tomatoes, peppers, and blueberry bushes). Digging a hole big enough for even such a tiny tree takes a surprising amount of time and effort. We also planted the hazel sapling from my parents' garden; meanwhile, the hawthorn saplings [livejournal.com profile] cleanskies gave us are flourishing. We are literally putting down roots here.

The eventual plan for the garden is that everything should be edible; the main exceptions at the moment are the daffodils, crocuses, and rather lurid primulas which we planted hastily to stop the garden looking quite so much like a post-apocalyptic wasteland (it worked!), though our definition of 'edible' includes anything Richard Mabey thinks you can eat, which allows quite a lot of leeway.

The best thing about the garden, though, is that we have a BADGER! OK, we've only actually seen it in next door's garden, not ours (we've seen a fox and a hedgehog in ours, though) but given the mess it's made of theirs I'm quite happy with that. I tried to get a photo but you can only really tell it's a badger if you already know. But, really, an ACTUAL LIVE BADGER!

We've definitely made more progress with the garden than with the house; while the garden's growing, the house is falling down. OK, that's a slight exaggeration: it's suffering from a small amount of subsidence, which has caused cracks to appear all over the place. The buildings insurance people think this is a) probably due to defective drains (as opposed to, say, tunnelling badgers), and b) probably not covered by our insurance because we were sort of warned that it was a possibility in the survey. It has taken them weeks and weeks to do anything, and we're still waiting for the results of the investigation of the drains. I was horribly worried about it at first, and it certainly added to the general hiding-under-a-rock stress; but you can't sustain that level of worry for this long, and the house hasn't actually fallen down, so now I am just wishing they would hurry up and tell us how much it will cost.

The subsidence does mean that pretty much everything else to do with the inside of the house is suffering from planning blight, though; realistically, we weren't going to have redecorated everything by now (my parents still haven't redecorated everything in their house, and they've lived there for 24 years now), but we were hoping to get started on sorting out the kitchen. We still don't have an oven, but it's not a big deal. Maybe we don't need an oven after all (at least two people now have said we should get a Remoska instead). It would feel slightly odd making a deliberate choice not to have an oven, to get the kitchen refitted without leaving room for one; but probably no odder than it would feel to a lot of people not to have a TV.

On the other hand, not having a TV doesn't really mean it's impossible to watch TV; it's just impossible to watch it live. We watched the whole first series of Glee (if you don't know what Glee is -- and given that I don't often watch TV, I don't take it for granted that everybody knows about every TV show -- then the Wikipedia entry will explain with no spoilers above the fold) suffering the indignity of being a week behind the rest of the UK because 4OD didn't release the episodes until they'd shown the repeat. Episodes! Repeats! Things I hadn't thought about at all since I last watched TV regularly, back in the late 1990s. I tried to persuade [livejournal.com profile] addedentry to do the bittorrent thing so we could get the next episodes quicker, but he wouldn't, and I don't know how (honestly! I've just never done it). We also watched the first episode of the new Dr Who (it is probably internet heresy to say that I don't really get Dr Who, but, well) despite nearly being put off by the utterly rubbish bit with the food at the beginning.

There's lots of other things I want to write about but I don't really know where to start, and more and more I feel as though LiveJournal isn't really the place to write about them, because I feel like I don't know anybody here very well any more. I don't have real conversations with very many people any more at all, and that's my fault for not being good at keeping up friendships, but it still feels like I've retreated into a dark empty room somehow and I don't quite know how to come back to the party, because everything is elsewhere, and I'm not totally sure that it wouldn't be better just to slip away home in the dark without another word.

Date: 2010-04-12 09:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] j4.livejournal.com
Lots of things seem to say that the Remoska is more energy-efficient, but I haven't found any solid figures.

a bad idea to use electricity for heating

Why's that? Are you saying that if/when we do get an oven, a gas oven would be better? (Definitely getting a gas hob - at the moment we are making do with one of those portable electric one-ring things - but I found gas ovens seemed to cook a bit unevenly... OTOH those were shitty gas ovens in rented houses, so, hm.)

It's such a minefield, though, and after a while I start thinking "well, it'd be easier if we didn't eat". :-{

Date: 2010-04-12 10:01 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ultraruby.livejournal.com
Using electricity for heating is inefficent because it's secondary energy, i.e the gas or oil or coal or whatever gets burned in a power station to turn the tubine make the electric, which then gets transformed down and channelled all across the land for you to then use, losing some energy along the way. When you burn gas directly you're using it as the primary source of energy, thus less loss.

That said, we still have an electric oven. Gas hob and gas heating but yeah. Electric ovens are just generally swifter and more even in my opinion.

Date: 2010-04-12 11:06 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hsenag.livejournal.com
You're assuming that the energy costs of pumping gas to your home rather than to the power station are less than the generation/transmission losses for electricity, and also that there isn't any difference in the efficiency of burning the gas at the power station and in the home. I'm sure it's the case (that using gas directly is better) but it does need to be considered.

Also, if you actually care about CO2 emissions rather than energy usage, then the story for electricity becomes rather more complicated.

Date: 2010-04-12 11:15 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ultraruby.livejournal.com
Oh aye, I make no claim for any of that stuff actually being very correct; it's just something I picked up at school and have sort of stuck to ever since as a rule of thumb.

Date: 2010-04-12 11:27 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] j4.livejournal.com
Yes, we do care about CO2 emissions - we've just switched to Ecotricity and we're on their New Energy Plus (http://www.ecotricity.co.uk/for-your-home/our-tariffs) (100% renewables) tariff. Still locked into British Gas for gas, but we'll change that when we can.

Cooking on a gas hob seems more efficient than electric because you don't have to leave it on for ages before it gets hot enough to do anything, but I'm not claiming that that means it is more efficient in terms of anything except my time/patience. And there are certainly better electric hobs out there than the one we've got.

Date: 2010-04-12 11:36 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hsenag.livejournal.com
Wind power worries me because it's not always on and we don't have the infrastructure to make effective use of bursty sources of power, so it's unclear how things will work out once it's a substantial portion of our generation mix.

Re the hob, it'd be pretty hard to measure the efficiency difference, especially since the answer will be different in winter to summer (in winter the waste heat has some use since you'd be heating your house anyway).

Date: 2010-04-12 11:42 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] j4.livejournal.com
I wondered how long we'd be on ecotricity before someone told me it was useless/bad/wrong. Three weeks is actually better than I expected.

in winter the waste heat has some use since you'd be heating your house anyway

If I admit that we didn't actually go and turn the heating off whenever we turned the hob on over the winter, that's probably tantamount to admitting to raping polar bears, isn't it?

Date: 2010-04-12 11:49 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hsenag.livejournal.com
I don't know if it is useless or not - I suspect that at worst it's neutral. It just worries me when it's touted as the solution to energy problems (whether fossil fuel exhaustion or CO2 emissions).

If I admit that we didn't actually go and turn the heating off whenever we turned the hob on over the winter, that's probably tantamount to admitting to raping polar bears, isn't it?

Only if you don't have a thermostat to do it for you, which is unlikely :-)

Date: 2010-04-12 02:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] damerell.livejournal.com
You want to read David MacKay's "Sustainable Energy", which - conveniently - is on the Web.

Wind is unlikely ever to form a substantial portion of our energy mix; it's not that bursty over the whole country, and we can easily handle burstiness in a small portion of the mix - modern hydro can be turned on and off extremely quickly, for example, making it ideal for covering over the gaps.

Date: 2010-04-12 12:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mooism.livejournal.com
It's a shame they don't have any solid figures on their site.

A gas oven with a fan should cook more evenly than a gas oven without, surely?

(What [livejournal.com profile] ultraruby said for using electricity for heating.)

"well, it'd be easier if we didn't eat"

Nonono, you just get takeaways instead. And then you get to moralistically condemn the takeaway people for using so much more energy than you ;-)

Date: 2010-04-12 02:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] addedentry.livejournal.com
you get to moralistically condemn the takeaway people for using so much more energy than you

One of our fellow lowcarbonistas in Oxford wants to (re)introduce community ovens. Perhaps I could argue for the economies of scale of takeaways?

Date: 2010-04-12 02:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mooism.livejournal.com
Are community ovens basically takeaways with your own ingredients? I've not encountered them before.

Date: 2010-04-12 02:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] addedentry.livejournal.com
It wasn't at all clear to me, but yes, I think the idea was that you would use a baker's oven when they weren't baking. No need to enumerate the potential problems here.

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15 161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 1st, 2026 01:57 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios