Is it human or is it dancer?
Nov. 11th, 2010 10:03 pmTomorrow we'll hopefully find out whether the baby is an alien or a predator a boy or a girl. So far I have been told that:
* it'll be a girl because everybody I know has had girls recently
* it'll be a boy because everybody I know has had girls recently
* it'll be a girl because you get more morning sickness with girls
* it'll be a boy because of the position of the bump
* it'll be a girl because of the position of the bump
* it'll be a boy because 'boy' scores more in Scrabble
So that's two answers from people who don't understand probability, three answers which sound to me more like superstition than something which is backed up by any actual research (though I'm happy to be proved wrong), and
invisiblechoir being silly. :-)
Two of my colleagues have a bet with each other about which it will be. I don't stand to gain any money from this bet myself, unfortunately. On the other hand, since earlier today one of them couldn't remember which way he'd bet (he'd decided at the time by tossing a coin) I don't think he's taking it that seriously. The other one asked me if I'd tried putting a toad on the bump to predict the baby's sex (I'm not sure quite what one is meant to do with the toad, or wait for the toad to do...?), so I guess he's not wholly serious either. I hope.
I confess I'm keen to know the answer, not least because referring to it as "it" feels awkward. Yes, I may get flamed for Gender Fail, but I'm afraid we're just not progressive enough to try to bring the child up without any awareness of the existence of sex or gender, and let's face it, there's a staggeringly high chance that it will be biologically male or female. Also, I'm going to have at least one more scan after tomorrow's, and I don't want to have to "look away from the screen now" for fear of spoiling the result -- I want to see what's going on! Basically, in most cases I will generally choose the path of More Information.
We also want to start thinking more seriously about names, and it'd be useful to narrow down the choices a bit. Other tactics for narrowing-down include: avoiding names with ambiguous spellings; avoiding extremely long names; avoiding alliteration; and summarily rejecting every single name that appears on this site. So that's a big 'no' to Breckin, Maxigan, Skyler Alexander, Cam'ron, and Kaytaquana. Suddenly, my silly suggestion of naming my child Badger doesn't seem all that ridiculous...
* it'll be a girl because everybody I know has had girls recently
* it'll be a boy because everybody I know has had girls recently
* it'll be a girl because you get more morning sickness with girls
* it'll be a boy because of the position of the bump
* it'll be a girl because of the position of the bump
* it'll be a boy because 'boy' scores more in Scrabble
So that's two answers from people who don't understand probability, three answers which sound to me more like superstition than something which is backed up by any actual research (though I'm happy to be proved wrong), and
Two of my colleagues have a bet with each other about which it will be. I don't stand to gain any money from this bet myself, unfortunately. On the other hand, since earlier today one of them couldn't remember which way he'd bet (he'd decided at the time by tossing a coin) I don't think he's taking it that seriously. The other one asked me if I'd tried putting a toad on the bump to predict the baby's sex (I'm not sure quite what one is meant to do with the toad, or wait for the toad to do...?), so I guess he's not wholly serious either. I hope.
I confess I'm keen to know the answer, not least because referring to it as "it" feels awkward. Yes, I may get flamed for Gender Fail, but I'm afraid we're just not progressive enough to try to bring the child up without any awareness of the existence of sex or gender, and let's face it, there's a staggeringly high chance that it will be biologically male or female. Also, I'm going to have at least one more scan after tomorrow's, and I don't want to have to "look away from the screen now" for fear of spoiling the result -- I want to see what's going on! Basically, in most cases I will generally choose the path of More Information.
We also want to start thinking more seriously about names, and it'd be useful to narrow down the choices a bit. Other tactics for narrowing-down include: avoiding names with ambiguous spellings; avoiding extremely long names; avoiding alliteration; and summarily rejecting every single name that appears on this site. So that's a big 'no' to Breckin, Maxigan, Skyler Alexander, Cam'ron, and Kaytaquana. Suddenly, my silly suggestion of naming my child Badger doesn't seem all that ridiculous...
no subject
Date: 2010-11-11 10:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-11 10:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-11 11:10 pm (UTC)It didn't immediately spring to my mind as an option because to the best of my knowledge I've never met anybody who was (or had been born) intersex, whereas I've met thousands of people who seemed to be quite uncomplicatedly male or female (and quite happy with that). If the baby does turn out to be intersex, well, that'll be jolly interesting, & we'll cross that bridge when we come to it!
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-11-11 10:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-11 10:25 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:I have a surefire method
Date: 2010-11-11 10:35 pm (UTC)the magic badgeryour husband to hold it over the bump. If it swings round and round its an alien, if it swings back and forth it's a predatorA shoelace would probably work, too
Re: I have a surefire method
Date: 2010-11-11 10:55 pm (UTC)Re: I have a surefire method
From:Re: I have a surefire method
From:Re: I have a surefire method
From:Re: I have a surefire method
Date: 2010-11-12 08:37 am (UTC)If it's a triceratops, I'll call it Trinity.
the colour may have a mild effect, yes
From:Re: I have a surefire method
From:no subject
Date: 2010-11-11 10:41 pm (UTC)Why only one badger
Date: 2010-11-11 10:54 pm (UTC)Re: Why only one badger
Date: 2010-11-11 11:24 pm (UTC)Re: Why only one badger
From:Re: Why only one badger
From:no subject
Date: 2010-11-11 11:23 pm (UTC)answer : it's both
Date: 2010-11-12 08:58 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-11-11 11:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-12 08:23 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-11-12 09:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-12 02:33 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-11-12 10:18 am (UTC)* nothing from Tolkien (R did try to sneak Earendil through on the grounds that it's a genuine Old English name, but thankfully not very seriously)
* no naming after friends cos that could cause envy or bad feelings (I rather liked Woodrow as a boy's name, or even Dickon, but then pals W Phoenix or D Edwards would get unfairly privileged).
* good associations - for a boy this meant trying to avoid the names of violent killers throughout history, and for a girl it meant a cool chick who did interesting stuff (a friend suggested Ada, as in Lovelace, which would have been a very good option had we not already gone for Aphra; we were tempted by the name Alfred for a boy, and A of Wessex was famed for learning as well as for burning cakes...).
no subject
Date: 2010-11-12 02:45 pm (UTC)HEAR HEAR. :) My parents had friends who called their daughter Bree after the town in Lord of the Rings. ("No, I'm not named after a cheese, it's spelt differently, I'm named after a fictional town." Poor kid.)
no naming after friends
Mm, I was thinking the same, but OTOH one of my favourite names at the moment is a name that's shared by two friends of ours (not especially close friends so it wouldn't be too weird). I don't think anybody would be likely to be offended, but, hmm.
Dickon is a great name, but always makes me think of the boy who talks to the squirrels and stuff in The Secret Garden.
good associations - for a boy this meant trying to avoid the names of violent killers throughout history, and for a girl it meant a cool chick who did interesting stuff
You weren't worried about avoiding violent female killers then? I mean, Myra is a nice name... so is Lucretia... ;-) Aphra is an excellent name though! And is distinctive without being difficult to spell, which is quite an achievement for names as far as I can tell.
One of my nieces (niece-in-law? Owen's brother's kid, anyway) is called Ada (but pronounced 'Ah-da' [actually sounds like 'ardour', hm, unfortunate] rather than 'Ay-da' -- her mother is German & I think the former is the German pronunciation), so that's already 'taken' in our family -- I am keen to avoid duplicating names that already exist within the most recent two or three generations, just for avoidance of confusion and/or a bit more variety!
I have heard of grown women who are called Bree
From:Re: I have heard of grown women who are called Bree
From:no subject
Date: 2010-11-12 10:23 am (UTC)Child has three given names and a hyphenated surname but we chose not to know the sex until the birth. His middle names are both old surnames from our two families. Firstname was really my choice as I vetoed what turned out to be three of the top names of the decade (Alexander, Oliver, Jack/John) and was bored witless at the idea of another William (one cousin) or Angus (another cousin). Using family surnames is unfashionable but fun.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-12 01:31 pm (UTC)I like the surnames-as-middle-names thing (though surnames always sound a bit more like boys' names, somehow) but I don't think we have any particularly exciting ones in our families. Though of course Owen has his old surname ("batchelor name", by analogy with maiden name?) as his middle name now... but he doesn't seem particularly keen to pass that on.
If you don't mind me asking, why did you chose not to know the sex until the birth? (Not that there has to be a reason -- entirely your decision & "just didn't want to" is fine! -- just interested to know why if you don't mind telling.)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-11-12 10:31 am (UTC)Response to a reader's feedback:
But British names make people sound so cultured and classy! That's what I tell my son Milton Keynes and my daughter, Berwick-on-Tweed.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-12 11:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-12 01:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-12 03:04 pm (UTC)Why not Alexander - or is that not "Skyler Alexander" and just "Alexander" is okay? Alex is one of those names where there will always be another in their school year. I'm not sure if that's good or bad, but at least it's spellable by all and sundry. (Though you'd think "Amanda" was, and at least one of my classmates spelt it "Amander" on a birthday card - I appreciated the card, but remember it 26 years later only because of the spelling.)
Everyone has an opinion - whether to find out, and whether girl or boy is best. And by everyone, once you're showing everyone includes the funny old lady at the bus stop, check out operators, Mrs Thingy from across the road and their grannies. You then get the name questions - and no matter what names you mention someone won't like it. It can be fun to play the awful name game with particularly difficult or gullible people.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-12 03:16 pm (UTC)<grin/>
I'm assured that the Weird Baby Dreams are quite common/normal, but I haven't had any yet. OK, I did have a dream that I'd already had the baby, but that was just a bit of a disappointment when I woke up & realised I still had another 20 weeks to go. :-}
Why not Alexander - or is that not "Skyler Alexander" and just "Alexander" is okay?
Ah no, "Alexander" is fine! It's just "Skyler Alexander" ... OK, it's the "Skyler" that is the problem, obviously, but it doesn't even fit nicely with the "Alexander".
I have a cousin called Alex, though, so that name's 'taken' in our family (I don't want to duplicate existing names within the most recent couple of generations, partly for variety and partly for avoiding the appearance of favouritism).
Everyone has an opinion - whether to find out, and whether girl or boy is best.
Well, too late for them to tell me not to find out (I don't mind what other people do!), & neither is "best", they're just different. :) Fortunately I am still small-bumped enough that I am not getting random strangers shoving their opinions down my throat yet...
no matter what names you mention someone won't like it
Tough! Mind you, no matter what we choose, at some point $child will probably decide they hate it too... :-}
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-11-12 04:38 pm (UTC)I didn't find out with either, partly because the chances of getting it wrong first time round were much higher, partly to avoid the all-pink or all-blue[*], and partly out of a weird idea that if I found out it would be because I preferred one way or the other (but I don't assume that's why other people find out). Also, Americans have their gender scan earlier and I was bored of announcements by the time I had Judith's scan. Neither father had strong feelings that they wanted to know, at least in Jon's case the chance of getting it wrong probably put him off.
Scans are so much better now though, in terms of detail. I loved being able to count Judith's toes (one foot only - the other she tucked behind the opposite thigh so we couldn't see). The difference between the two was basically that with Benedict's we could see the whole heart but with Judith we could clearly see all four chambers.
[*]I'm such a hypocrite - Judith woremostly blue until Colin called me on it.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-12 04:54 pm (UTC)I think I know what you mean -- I did worry about whether I was subconsciously preferring one to the other, but I decided it'd be better to have the information & stop wondering/worrying -- though yes, if it turns out they did get it wrong (yes, I do know now, will post later with new alien/predator pics ;-) it will be a bit strange!
But as far as I could tell from lots of navel-gazing I didn't really have a strong preference for one or the other, apart from a vague & probably irrational sense that a girl would be easier for me to bring up because I already know more about Girl Stuff. (OTOH obviously Owen knows more about Boy Stuff, and anyway there exist books and the internet, so, eh.)
Scans are so much better now though, in terms of detail.
It's awesome isn't it! :-) The four chambers of the heart! The stomach! Every bone of the spine!
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-11-12 05:18 pm (UTC)My dreams involve a lot of reading LJ posts, surfing the web and reading books. I don't know why I couldn't have been actually at the scan in the dream. Failure of imagination, probably.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-12 05:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-13 11:35 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-11-12 05:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-12 05:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-12 06:16 pm (UTC)I wanted to accept the baby full stop without placing a load of gender-based preconditioned thoughts of my own on it. I'm a feminist, full on, so if it was a boy he was going to understand that women are human beings; if a girl, she would be human and know how to be so, strongly, in a world full of essentialist "gender complementarity" myths. So, my way forward being clear in my own mind, I didn't want to complicate my life with worrying more about those details.
Also, I wanted the surprise!
Funniest thing EVER: the acquaintance who said "you're such a feminist, I was so sure you'd just to have to have a girl".
no subject
Date: 2010-11-13 11:32 pm (UTC)Mm. I fear that bullshit will turn up anyway, though -- and to be honest I think that, tired as I am, I've probably got more time/energy to deal with it now than I will have after two years without a single night of unbroken sleep. :-}
I wanted to accept the baby full stop without placing a load of gender-based preconditioned thoughts of my own on it. I'm a feminist, full on, so if it was a boy he was going to understand that women are human beings; if a girl, she would be human and know how to be so, strongly, in a world full of essentialist "gender complementarity" myths.
These both sound like excellent wishes and intentions; I sincerely hope that knowing the baby's sex now isn't going to stop me accepting it fully or teaching it sensible things when it's old enough to learn them!
(I find I still keep saying "it" even though I now know what sort of "it" it is, & I think that's at least partly because I'm wary of projecting a personality on to it before it has a chance to develop one. Also I do know that determining the sex from the scan isn't a 100%-foolproof thing and it still could turn out to be a boy...)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-11-12 10:47 pm (UTC)