j4: (blade)
[personal profile] j4
So the other day I decided to actually buy a copy of the Opera web browser, because I was annoyed by the banner ads in the free version but even more annoyed by IE crashing my iMac every ten minutes.

Having got the registration code for the new version, I went to download my copy. Quick download, quick install. However, when I came to actually launch the application, it told me "This application requires MacOS 8.6 or higher and CarbonLib 1.5 or higher." Well, I'm running MacOS 9.1, so I went to find out what the hell CarbonLib is when it's at home, and discovered that it's some kind of software development kit for the Mac, and it's freely downloadable. So I download that (which takes about 20 minutes because it's huge) and install it, and reboot the machine, and have another go at running Opera ... only to get exactly the same error message.

Opera's website (which is utterly broken in IE on the Mac) doesn't, as far as I can tell, give any more detailed information about requirements for running Opera 6 than to say what version of MacOS is needed.

Opera's website also, however, doesn't seem to want to give up anything resembling a tech support email address, except to registered users. Who in order to access this service need to enter their username and password, which they get when they register, which they can only do by launching the bloody application.

Anybody have any suggestions? Am I missing something obvious?

Date: 2003-11-12 04:07 am (UTC)
chrisvenus: (Default)
From: [personal profile] chrisvenus
So it uses 13 meg more for 7 more web pages doesn't seem that good to me :)

I would be interested in how much a fresh opera and fresh mozilla running the same page would be though. I'm just getting the impression that you are saying one or other sucks from memory usage PoV but I'm trying to tell which it might be from the information given. :)

Date: 2003-11-12 07:10 am (UTC)
sparrowsion: photo of male house sparrow (tree_sparrow)
From: [personal profile] sparrowsion
Um. I was trying to show that an opera that's had ages to build up a pile of cruft has scarcely any more memory footprint than a fresh mozilla. One of my main reasons for switching to opera in the first place was how insanely memory-hungry every other (graphical) browser I tried was. I've just tried a fresh opera with those pages (I didn't want to lose state) and a fresh mozilla with them, and they're comparable. Either opera's got a lot worse in version 7, or mozilla's caught up a lot.

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15 161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 15th, 2026 12:56 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios